The tradeoff is complexity. The microcode must be carefully arranged so that the instructions in delay slots are either useful setup for both paths, or at least harmless if the redirect fires. Not every case is as clean as RETF. When a PLA redirect interrupts an LCALL, the return address is already pushed onto the microcode call stack (yes, the 386 has a microcode call stack) -- the redirected code must account for this stale entry. When multiple protection tests overlap, or when a redirect fires during a delay slot of another jump, the control flow becomes hard to reason about. During the FPGA core implementation, protection delay slot interactions were consistently the most difficult bugs to track down.
7. 积极扩大内需，筑牢增长根基——2026年中国经济展望与政策建议 - 北京大学光华管理学院, www.gsm.pku.edu.cn/info/1316/3…
stack.push(cur);，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
Copyright © 1997-2026 by www.people.com.cn all rights reserved
。旺商聊官方下载对此有专业解读
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用，推荐阅读safew官方版本下载获取更多信息
20+ curated newsletters